Candidate
The page answers a useful question and is ready for direct comparison with the other candidates.
Shortlist maintenance
A useful shortlist is not a pile of bookmarks. Every row should show its current status, last observation, reason to keep, and next unresolved question.
Give each row a status, last-checked date, reason to keep, and next question. Mark changed, locked, missing, or mismatched pages visibly. Remove rows that duplicate better evidence or no longer answer a real research question.
Shortlist versus archive
An archive preserves history. A shortlist narrows the next comparison. If a saved result has no question, no distinguishing evidence, and no next action, it probably belongs in the archive or should be removed.
A smaller list with explicit unknowns is easier to review than a large list of links labeled “maybe.”
Four practical statuses
The page answers a useful question and is ready for direct comparison with the other candidates.
A promising result still needs a source, measurement, code match, quote context, or other named evidence.
The page is locked, unavailable, changed, or waiting on a specific answer. Keep the reason and date visible.
The row is a duplicate, mismatch, unsupported claim, or dead end with no remaining research value.
When a page changes
A repeatable review
A future reader should be able to see why each row remains, what was checked, what changed, and what evidence is still missing. The list does not verify sellers, products, contacts, stock, or transaction outcomes.